Vanishing Hitchhiker Update

Paul Smith | Letters to Ambrose Merton # 5, 1996

Under the heading “A haunting we will go”, the Pittsburg Post-Gazette (31October 1995) printed letters from readers about their experiences of “ghosts and other haunts”. These include the following account from Christopher Cservak, aged eight, of Bridgeville.

One night last fall I was coming home from a football game with my mom and dad and brother Reid when it started to rain. Then it started to pour, lightning flashed, and the thunder was so loud it almost woke u my brother.

Just then my dad slammed on the brakes, and I looked out the window. I saw a little blond girl standing there soaking wet. I wondered what she could be doing out by herself late at night.

My mom asked her if she needed a ride home. She said she would be grateful if we could drop her off at her house about a mile up the road. When she got in the car, she was shivering because she was so wet and cold. I offered her my green sweater s she could keep warm, and she put it on.

WE drove down the street to her house, it was still raining hard, and I was looking out the window at the lightning. When we reached her house, my dad stopped the car. I looked over to where she was sitting, and she was gone! I couldn’t believe it.

My mom ran up to the house t see if she had gone inside. A woman answered the door, and my mom asked if she a had a little girl about 8 years old with blond hair. My mom explained that we had found her by the side of the road and were worried about her.

The woman looked upset and said that she did have an -8year old daughter named Mary, but that she had died three years ago on that very night. Well, my mom couldn’t believe it! The woman told us to go back to where we had found the girl. Nearby was a cemetery where Mary was buried.

My dad drove back to the cemetery, and we got out and found Mary’s grave. Ext to her name on the headstone was hanging my favorite green sweater.

A Note About “The Vanishing Hitchhiker”

Bill Ellis | Dear Mister Thom # 35, 1994

Bill Ellis has written to suggest that maybe the earliest clear reference to the “Vanishing Hitchhiker” plot line can be found in William Henderson’s Folklore of the Northern Counties of England (1866) The story pp 273-4 of the American edition of 1973 (Ottowa: Rowman and Littlefield) has the “hopeless pilgrimage” motif common in “Vanishing Hitchhiker” stories but unusual in a ghost story of the period. Here is the story:

“On St Thomas’s eve and day, too, have carriers and waggoners been most alarmed by the ghost of the murdered woman, who was wont to haunt the path or lane between Cradle Well and Neville’s Cross. With her child dangling at her side, she used to join parties coming or going out of Durham in carriers’ carts or wagons, would enter the vehicles and there seat herself, but always disappearing when they reached the limit of her hopeless pilgrimage.”

Bizarre Tales of a Mysterious Hitchhiker

Bill Ellis | Dear Mister Thom # 34, 1994

FRACKVILLE – If someone walked up to you and told you a story about an experience they had or about which they heard concerning a hitchhiker who foretold “The end is near” and disappeared from “inside” a vehicle, what would you think?

Like most people, you would probably doubt the report or maybe turn the TV set to the popular “Unsolved Mysteries” show and try to summon its host, Robert Stack, to unravel the bizarre event.

Editorial sceptics

Such a story was brought to the attention of the Evening Herald recently and the reactions of editorial department personnel were predictable “Yeah, right”.

A check with state police, however, revealed troopers had received several calls relating to the hitchhiker incident.

Sgt. Barry Reed, station commander at Frackville, confirmed receiving three or four calls about the mysterious vanishing hitchhiker, from reliable and credible individuals who all shared the same experience.

The “hitchhiker” was described as a tall, thin man with long dark hair and wearing a long dark coat. He was picked up on Route61 near Frackville’s southern end on Monday, Jan 31, between 6 and 7 a.m.

Several stories

However, contrary to the “unofficial” reports, state troopers said they received no reports about the “hitchhiker” in conversation about the weather, the turbulence of society or the Angel Gabriel “tooting his horn for the second time”.

However, troopers did say reports made to them concerned the hitchhiker having said ‘I am here to tell you the end is near,’ before vanishing into thin air.

Some reports relayed to the Evening Herald alleged the mysterious hitchhiker warned, ‘Jesus is coming! Jesus is coming’ and then disappeared.

Sgy. Reed recalled that while he was stationed in Lancaster County about 10 years ago, a similar ‘hitchhiker tale was circulated.

Think it was a hoax

In reference to the Lancaster County incidents and the Schuykill County reports, Sgt. Reed said, ‘I believe it is a hoax. But the people are reliable.’

Sgt. Reed said he travels ‘up and down’ the Frackville grade to Saint Clair daily and never noticed anything.

‘Even people who never pick up hitchhikers pick them up,’ said Sgt. Reed, who particularly pointed to a case involving a Frackville woman who apparently had never before stopped for a hitchhiker.

Motorists tend to feel sorry for hitchhikers, especially during the cold winter weather, and subsequently act contrary to their beliefs by picking them up.

Sgt. Reed said, ‘In at least one of the reports, I regarded the person as the most reliable.’
No calls elsewhere

A check with the Hazelton and Schuyhill Haven state police revealed there were no calls about the mystical man.

Sgt. Reed offered this advice to motorists, ‘Don’t pick up any hitchhikers. That’s always good advice.’

Story by Rosanne M. Hall, Evening Herald (Shenandoah, PA), 4 February 1994.

Haunted by a Song

Mark Moravec | Dear Mister Thom # 30, 1993

Mark has found the clipping below which recounts an English “Vanishing Hitchhiker” story. He asks whether any reader has heard the specific legend mentioned. The item comes from New Idea, a popular Australian women’s magazine. It is also, he observes, “an example of the exploitation of contemporary legend storylines by popular culture, this time as the basis for a song”.

If any DMT reader with access to local newspapers in the South East would like to check whether the story rally did form the basis for a court case in Southend, we would dearly love to hear from you.

“Haunted by a Song

Several times over the past few years rock star and actor Jon English has made the big decision to drop the ghost song She Was Real! From his concert performance.

But for some inexplicable reason, at the last minute before he steps on stage, he always changes his mind.

It’s now 10 years since Jon wrote and first performed She Was Real! Which tells the eerie story of a ghostly sighting of Susie, a teenage girl who had been killed in a traffic accident. And he still can’t bring himself to put the song to rest permanently.

‘Susie’s ghost is just hanging around and haunting me’, Jon lightheartedly confesses wit a hint of nervousness. ‘I could have killed her off from my concerts long ago, but here we are 10 years since I wrote the song and she still won’t go home. I’m beginning to wonder if I’ll ever get rid of her.’

She was real! Is based on an 1982 court case in Southend, England, where Jon’s family lived. A young motorcyclist had faced the court charged with causing malicious mischief, and in his defence he said he’d been riding his motorcycle around midnight in Southend when he was hailed by a girl hitchhiker of about 18.

They stopped to have coffee at a café, and she told him her name was Susie. She told the motorcyclist where she lived so he could drop her off.

When they came to the Cheltenham Road roundabout the bike went over a bump and the young man thought he heard a thud from behind. He looked around and the girl was not there.

He rode to the nearest police station to report the accident. The police returned to the roundabout with him and after a lengthy search there was no sign of the missing girl. So the police went to the address the motorcyclist gave them. A middle-aged woman gave them the astonishing information that her daughter Susan had died in 1970 in a motorcycle crash at the Cheltenham Road roundabout.

Police tracked down the motorcyclist and, although he stuck to his story, he was arrested for the trouble he had caused.

‘The guy was so convincing in court, they let him off’, says Jon.

‘It’s a story that fascinated me so much I just had to write a song about it’, he says.

‘She just won’t disappear, Creepy, isn’t it?’

Story: Alan Veitch”

The Phantom Meaning-Giver Strikes Again

Gillian Bennett | Dear Mister Thom # 23, 1991

In an article, “modern-day folk tales too strange to be true”, in the Sacramento Bee (31 May 1991), the writer, Katherine Bishop, goes on a quest for urban legends and finds Jan Brunvand and Alan Dundes. Brunvand keeps to description, but Dundes engages in some pretty fancy interpretation when asked to comment on thefamiliar legend of “The Vanishing Hitchhiker”.

“Dr Alan Dundes” says Bishop, “a professor of anthropology at the University of Caifornia, Berkeley, said the story was widespread and the the driver was always a man and the hitchhiker was always female.

“Instead of viewing the events in the ale from the point of view of the driver, he said, thetale should be told from the point of view of the young woman, since it is usually told by adolescent girls to one another.

“It is a cautionary tale” he said, warning girls that if they allow themselves to be “picked up” – an idea loaded with sexual innuendo and threat – their punishment will be that they can ever go home again.”

There is only one thing wrong with this statement – it is ridiculous.

Unfortunately it is typical of the sort of things that modern legend scholars are coming up with these days – no better, no worse. Grated, if a journalist called me up while I was having my lunch and asked me to say something interesting about ”The Vanishing Hitchhiker”, I probably would say something silly too. But many respected academics are making similar statements in respectable professional journals too, so these sorts of interpretations can’t all be blamed on the importunateness of the press.

The trouble is that meaning is thought to reside in the plot or the content of the story, not in the minds of the tellers and hearers who share it. In effect, therefore, these meanings actually reside in the mind of the commentator him/herself.

In fact, the stories can be fitted into almost any preconceived intellectual formula. Max Muller would have seen that “The Vanishing Hitchhiker” was plainly the remnant of a moon myth. Its central character is a pale virgin who walks the night, disappears at regular times ad places, only to reappear once more at the spot where she was first seen. Obviously the vanishing hitchhiker is the vanishing moon. Even the car can be fitted in to the scheme: it is dark, it is enclosed and secret, it swallows her up – it is plainly the night.

Frazer would have seen it as a very interesting and important vegetation myth. With the aid of comparative data from the Bonka-Bonka tribe of the Upper Limpopo Valley, he would have shown that it is the last remnant of a goddess cult. And very exciting it would have been, for usually the vegetation God who dies and is revived again is a male, but here the hitchhiker who dies and reappears and dies again is a female.

Nowadays the fashion is for psychoanalytic-symbolic approaches, allied to a functionalist orientation which demands that modern legends are dire social warnings. Hence, the Dundes interpretation of the legend as a sexual cautionary tale. However, even given this framework, it doesn’t make sense to say that the story warns girls that if they get picked up by men they’ll never go home again. In these stories, the girl is already dead before she takes the ride. If anything, it would go to prove the reverse – that her only, last chance of life is to be picked up (what’s more it would actually accord with many girls’ opinions).

So, personally, if we have to have a modern “psychological” explanation of the story, I prefer te interpretation which my friend Professor Toni Baloni, a keen student of modern folklore, proposes.

“The Vanishing Hitchhiker”, she wrote only recently, “is best understood as a poignant story about an unwanted pregnancy and the consequent stillbirth. The car in which the passenger travels is obviously the womb – an enclosed space in which the stranger travels for a short time, lulled by the drone and vibration of the body’s engine, the parent heart. The hitchhiker – unnamed, unknown, mysterious – is an unborn child. This much is quite clear and allows us to reconstruct the rest of the allegory.

The hitchhiker flags down the driver and imposes herself unexpectedly on him (we can see here the monstrous effect of out paternalistic society, where even the procreative function is linguistically and metaphorically attributed to the male) – so plainly this is not a planned pregnancy. The hitchhiker appears out of nowhere with no past: it appears then that the woman does not know who the father is.

But there the child is, to be carried, silently and passively, to her destination. Alas! The pregnancy doe not continue to full term: the “hitchhiker” disappears from the “car” in mid-journey. Very little is left to mark her short passage of life – a pool of water on the floor (waters of life? Amniotic fluid?), a marker on te grave, maybe a picture. She never arrives at her destination. All that is left of her is grief.

Plainly this is a cautionary tale put out by the London Rubber Company.”

Apostrophe Watch

Sandy Hobbs | Letters to Ambrose Merton # 23, 2000

In his column in The Guardian newspaper on 6 June 2000, Matthew Engel declared:

“The apo’strophes days done!”

Engel noted that, although the chain store J Sainsbury is being “rebranded” Sainsbury’s (as opposed to Sainsburys), many existing British company and brand names are “apostrophe-free zones”, citing Barclays, Lloyds, Mothers Pride amongst his examples. This is balanced by what he calls “the greengrocers’ apostrophe” which “sneaks into everything from apple’s to yam’s”.

According to Engel, the apostrophe “was introduced from France (like rabies) in the mid-16th century, and has caused nothing but trouble ever since”. In the late 17th century some regularity began to appear in the use of the apostrophe in the genitive singular. However, place names “were and are shambolic”: Golders Green but St John’s Wood; Barons Court but Earl’s Court. Engel also notes the confusion over singular names ending in “s”. “Do they take an extra ‘s’ or not?”

“The rules governing the apostrophe are incoherent, illogical and of dubious provenance. Why did whose replace who’s?… Bernard Shaw had the answer 100 years ago. Do away with the apostrophe.”

In contrast to Engel, Inspector Morse and Sergeant Lewis, the Oxford detectives created by Colin Dexter, both show a concern with misused apostrophes in the latest (and last?) book in the series. Does their concern reflect the point of view of the author?

First, Morse:

Morse watched his visitor waddling somewhat steadily towards the police car parked confidently in the ‘Resident’s Only’ parking area. (Yes! Morse had mentioned the apostrophe to the Chairman of the Residents’ Welfare Committee). (p. 28)

Later Lewis interviews Biff, a pub landlord wearing a T-shirt bearing the words “The Maidens Arms” (p. 122). As Lewis leaves, he asks:

“Shouldn’t there be an apostrophe before the ‘s’?”

Biff grinned. “Funny you should say that. Fellow in here last night asked me exactly the same thing!” (p. 125)

The “fellow” was Morse.

Thirdly, we are told the text of instructions issued staff at a dump site:

MEMO FROM SITE MANAGER

Thames Valley Police have advised of the possibility of a human body, probably bagged, being recently conveyed from the Redbridge Centre in Oxford. Everyone is asked to be extra vigilant and to report anything unusual (or usual provided its a body).

The author comments:

Morse himself would have been pleased to write such a succinct note – though inserting, of course, an apostrophe in the humorous parenthesis. (p. 135)

Colin Dexter, The Remorseful Day, London: Pan Books Paperback Edition, 2000. (Hardback Edition, 1999)

Apostrophes

Sandy Hobbs | Letters to Ambrose Merton # 22, 2000

Under the heading “Farewell, My Lovely, in the last issue, I suggested that popular usage was leading the the death of “apostrophe s”. here are two more pieces of evidence.

A pub in central Paisley calls itself “Hamishes House”. Is there one Hamish? Or are there more? Hamish’s? Hamishs’?

Ira Levin’s novel The Stepford Wives was recently republished for Sight and Sound by Bloomsbury of London. On page 32 there is a reference to “a pitcher of Bloody Mary’s”. This book was first published in Britain in 1972 and presumably earlier in the United States. Was the punctuation the same originally?

Apostrophes: Farewell, My Lovely

Sandy Hobbs | Letters to Ambrose Merton # 21, 2000

Apostrophe-s and s-apostrophe are valuable ways of avoiding possible ambiguities in written English. I suspect this may be a dying view. Almost daily I meet examples of missing, misplaced or inappropriate apostrophes accompanying a concluding “s”. Student essays, shop signs, advertisements and newspapers are all responsible. Perhaps it is the will of the folk that the apostrophe should no longer be linked to the “s”. That can be a powerful will. However, I was surprised to find the National Trust, guardian of much of our cultural heritage, apparently assisting in the death.

The National trust leaflet “Runnymede: Birthplace of the Magna Carta”, explaining the character of the document tells the reader that it “defined the barons feudal obligations to the monarch“. If the apostrophe is not safe in the hands of the National Trust, who will protect it?

Dear Reader…

Sandy Hobbs | Letters to AMbrose Merton # 21, 2000

(NOTE, 2011: This editorial has been reproduced because it gives a clue to the circumstances in which LTAM eventually ceased publication.)

A high proportion of contributions to Letters to Ambrose Merton now arrive by e-mail. This is itself is not a particularly striking fact. However, what is worth particular attention is that the contributors themselves frequently received the material by e-mail. In other words, our newsletter becomes the end of one particular branch of the internet communication chain.

This gives us pause for thought. What if any are the distinctive features of e-communications as opposed to material from other sources? Is e-mail significantly changing the character of communications between the people who use it? The most profound question of all may be “What is the role of a publication such as Ambrose Merton when so many of us communicate so much through the internet?”

We do not attempt to answer these questions in this issue. However, it does contain an unusually high proportion of material which has been in circulation as forwarded e-mail and thus provides us with some “raw data” which may be relevant to answering these questions.

It may be noted that many of these items are composed of lists. These are not unique to e-communications, of course. Some of the examples in this issue are in the style of “Colemanballs” a column in Private Eye magazine composed of slips by sports commentators, which subsequently became the content of a successful series of books. However, it is reasonable to ask if there is some particular aspect of the internet which encourages the deployment of lists in humour. Lists were certainly a substantial part of the jokes circulated by computer network in the early 1980s which were presented in LTAM No. 8 (1996).

Dead Man On Campus

Sandy Hobbs | Letters to Ambrose Merton # 20, 1999

One of the papers in A Nest of Vipers, edited by Gillian Bennett and Paul Smith (Sheffield Academic Press, 1990) is “The roommate’s suicide and the 4.0” by William S. Fox. Fox summarises this piece of contemporary American college lore as:

If your roommate commits suicide, you get a 4.0 that semester.
The value “4.0” means the highest marks available in each subject.

Dead Man on Campus is a feature film whose narrative is built round this concept. Josh (Tom Everett Scott) enters the medical programme at Daleman College on an academic scholarship. He intends to work hard but is distracted by his partying roommate Cooper (Mark-Paul Gosselaar) and by Rachel (Poppy Montgomery) who becomes his girl friend. Josh’s early grades are so bad that he would find it impossible to achieve the average for the year which he requires to keep his scholarship. Cooper’s business-man father arrives on campus and threatens dire consequences if he does not start working, so both roommates are in trouble.

In a bar, an old drunk tells them of his experience at college, His roommate committed suicide and he benefitted from a college rule that “if your roommate kills himself you get straight As”. Cooper’s reaction is to suggest that Josh sacrifice himself but Josh rejecxts that idea, However, they decide to check out the College Charter in the library. In a section on suicide they discover that it does contain just such a provision. Cooper persuades Josh that they should arrange to have a suicidal student move in with them. They try to increase their knowldge of the circumstances in which suicide s are committed. Josh goes the the Psychology department for information where he is interviewed by Dr Durkheim. Durkheim wrongly assumes that Josh is himself contemplating taking his own life. [This is presumably a knowing reference to Emile Durkheim, the author of a famous sociological analysis of suicide,]

They focus on a number of potential suicides, including a paranoid who believes Bill Gates is trying to control his brain and a rock musician who only pretends to be suicidal to create an appropriate image. Having given up their attempts to benefit from the suicide rule, they find a friend, Pickle, who has swallowed pills and left a suicide note. Believing him to be already dead, they plan to move him into their room. However, Josh realises he is still alive and revives him. Cooper is angry that Josh has spoilt their last chance of good grades and they quarrel.

Josh climbs the College Tower and threatens to jump. A crowd gathers but Cooper succeed in “talking him down”. Once saved, Josh secretly tells Cooper that he figures that the college would not expel a student who had shown himself to be suicidal. He is correct and he stays on to study psychology rather than medicine. Cooper’s father, impressed by his success in saving Josh from suicide, agrees to finance another year at college. Things seem to have worked out well for them both, but they arrange for Pickle to move in with them, “just in case” things go wrong.

Dead Man on Campus was copyrighted in 1998 by Paramount Pictures. It is an MTV Production, directed by Alan Cohn and produced by Gale Anne Hurd. The story is credited to Anthony Abrams and Adam Larson Broder. The screenplay is by Michael Traeger and Mike White.